![]() Many differences in color rendering btw the two RAW processors. Lastly I just changed the exposure moving 2/3 of a stop on both the processors.Īnd here the conclusions. Then I moved to the so called “capture sharpening” which is that kind of sharpening you normally add to the image in Camera Raw or with specific tools (I’m a look time user of the PIXELGENIUS apps). I had an hard time to find adjust WB in ACR to make it look similar to IRIDIENT and, at the end, I arrived to something similar but without a great deal of success. Selected a good white point on the traffing sign, and rebalanced the image. Given this from the RAW I had to adjust the white balance. In the first part of the video you’ll have a full look&feel of my trials with WB. I still hope for a good firmware update fixing this strange behavior. This is the main difference btw the X100 and the X100s and why, IMHO, JPG only shooting with the X100S is a no-go. This is, in my opinion, the current major drawback of the X100s: as I’ve already noticed in comparison with the X100 I still believe the white balance is far too much cool and produces colors I don’t like since they’re simply unrealistic. The sky color looks unnatural, really different from what was in reality. Mmm… As usual the camera is too much on the cooler side, 5.100 k in full daylight. ACR output just resized.įirst of all let’s give a look to the file as it was shot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |